Adult Film Censorship: F


 

 

 

 

Face Fucking Inc.

Directed by Joey Silvera / 2006 / USA / IMDb

Date: May 2007
Rating:
RC
Time:
Unknown
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
Calvista
Reason: Film 1(a) The film is classified RC in accordance with the National Classification Code, Films Table, 1. (a) as films that "depict, express or otherwise deal with matters of sex, drug misuse or addiction, crime, cruelty, violence or revolting or abhorrent phenomena in such a way that they offend against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that they should not be classified."

 

Date: June 2007
Rating:
X18+ (Explicit sex)
Time:
Unknown
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
Calvista
Comment:
Censored by unknown time


 

 

 

 

Fallen Angel

aka Fallen Angel 1

Directed by Bruce Cam / 1997 / USA / IMDb

Date: April 2006
Rating:
RC
Time:
Unknown
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
Calvista
Reason: Film 1(a) The film is classified RC in accordance with the National Classification Code, Films Table, 1. (a) as films that "depict, express or otherwise deal with matters of sex, drug misuse or addiction, crime, cruelty, violence or revolting or abhorrent phenomena in such a way that they offend against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that they should not be classified."

 

Fallen Angel (1997) - Directed by Bruce Cam


 

 

 

 

Fame is a Whore on Butt Row

Directed by Joey Silvera / 1996 / USA / IMDb

Date: October 2000
Rating:
RC
Time:
125m
Format:
VHS
Applicant:
The AXIS Group

 

Date: January 2001
Rating:
X18+ (Contains real depictions of actual sexual activity)
Time:
125m
Format:
VHS
Applicant:
AXIS (A Division of Adultshop.com)
Comment: Review Board Appeal

In September 2000, stricter guidelines were introduced for the X18+ rating. This resulted in confusion between the OFLC and distributors as to what was now permitted. In November 2000, as a way of clarifying the new standards, appeals against nine RC-ratings were made to the Classification Review Board.

The titles and outcomes were:

 

 

Review Board report

33rd MEETING
9, 10,17 NOVEMBER 2000
23-33 MARY STREET
SURRY HILLS NSW:

8 DECEMBER 2000 (BY TELECONFERENCE)

PRESENT: Ms Barbara Biggins (Convenor)
Mr Jonathan O'Dea (Deputy Convenor)
Ms Glenda Banks
Ms Joan Yardley
Ms Robin Harvey
Mr Ross Tzannes

APPLICANT: AXIS, a division of Adultshop.com Limited

BUSINESS: To review the decision of the Classification Board to assign the classification RC (Refused Classification) under the Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Act 1995 to the film Fame is a Whore ... On Butt Row.

 

DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION

1. Decision

The Classification Review Board decided to set aside the decision of the Classification Board, and to classify the film Fame is a Whore ...On Butt Row X18+ with the consumer advice "Contains real depictions of actual sexual activity".

 

2. Legislative Provisions

The Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Act J 995 (the Act) governs the classification of films and the review of classification decisions. The Act provides that films be classified in accordance with the National Classification Code and the classification guidelines. Relevantly, the National Classification Code (the Code) in paragraph 1. of the Table under the heading "Films" provides that films that "depict, express or otherwise deal with matters of sex, drug misuse or addiction, crime, cruelty, violence or revolting or abhorrent phenomena in such a way that they offend against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that they should not be classified" should be classified "RC."

Further, the Code provides that films that

a) contain real depictions of actual sexual activity between consenting adults in which there is no violence, sexual violence, sexualised violence, coercion, sexually assaultive language, or fetishes or depictions which purposefully demean anyone involved in that activity for the enjoyment of viewers, in a way that is likely to cause offence to a reasonable adult; and

b) are unsuitable for a minor to see

may be classified "X 18+".

In addition, the Guidelines for the classification of films and videotapes (Amendment No.3, 18 September 2000) provide, in part that, "No depiction of violence, sexual violence, sexualised violence or coercion is allowed in the category. It does not allow sexually assaultive language. Nor does it allow consensual depictions, which purposefully demean anyone involved in that activity for the enjoyment of viewers. Fetishes such as body piercing, application of substances such as candle wax, 'golden showers', bondage, spanking or fisting are not permitted."

 

3. Procedure

3.1 Four members of the Review Board viewed the film at its meeting on 9-10, 17th November 2000.

 

4. Matters Taken into Account

In reaching its decision the Board of Review had regard to the following:

(a) the applicant's Application for Review

(b) the film Fame is a Whore ... On Butt Row.

(c) written and oral arguments made by Ms Elvis Caneers-Barnes and Mr John Davey on behalf of the applicant

(d) the relevant provisions in the Act

(e) the relevant provisions in the National Classification Code as amended in accordance with section 6 of the Act and endorsed by Censorship Ministers

(f) the current Classification Guidelines for the classification of Films and Videotapes determined under section 12 of the Act.

 

5. Findings on material Questions of fact

5.1 The film contained various unrelated scenes of real depictions of actual sexual activity.

5.2 The Review Board considered the scene cited by the Classification Board as leading to an RC classification. This occurred at 77 minutes and in which a female is given one smack, followed by sounds of further smacking off screen. A female with reddened buttocks leans over a couch and is given three further smacks each by two other participants.

5.3 The Review Board found that the scene at 77 mins did not contain a depiction of a fetish such as spanking.

5.4 As the film contained real depictions of actual sexual activity as in the Code para 2 under Films, the Review Board found that the film was appropriately classified X 18+.

 

6. Reasons for the Decision

6.1 The Review Board based its decision to classify the film X18+ with the consumer advice "contains real depictions of sexual activity" on its content as described in 5.1 to 5.4 above.

6.2 To aid it in its determination as to whether the scene at 77 mins constituted a depiction of a fetish such as spanking, the Review Board examined the intent of the Code and Guidelines in this regard.

6.3 The Review Board found that while some "fetishes" listed in the Guidelines, such as the application of candlewax, golden showers, bondage and fisting can be fairly easily recognised, the same cannot be said of "fetishes such as spanking". The Review Board saw a potential distinction between acts of spanking or smacking and .. a fetish such as spanking".

6.4 The definition in the glossary to the Guidelines provides that a fetish is "an object, an action, or a non sexual part of the body which gives sexual gratification". This definition also gives rise to problems of interpretation, viz there are many actions which give sexual gratification but which would not usually be deemed to be "fetishes"- such as kissing, and playful slapping or smacking.

6.5 The Review Board looked at the Macquarie Dictionary (3rd ed) for a definition of .spanking". It found that "spanking" means to strike (quickly and vigorously) with an open hand as a punishment. "Smacking" is to strike smartly or forcibly with an open hand, or a smart resounding blow.

6.6 The Review Board found that a common characteristic of the list of "fetishes such as "in the Guidelines, and which arise from the Code, was that these either demean, or cause harm or pain, in a sexual context, and for sexual gratification.

6.7 Using this analysis, the Review Board considered that the depiction was of smacking in the context of consensual sex, to produce sexual gratification. The depiction contained no elements of punishment, nor of activity which would demean for the enjoyment of viewers (in the sense used in the Code and Guidelines). The Review Board concluded that the scene at 77mins did not therefore constitute a depiction of a fetish such as spanking.

6.8 The applicant argued that the Classification Board failed to

(a) take sufficient account of the nature of the film

(b) take full account of the wording and intent of the Act and the National Classification Code.

(c) reasonably apply the film Classification Guidelines as they apply to depictions of fetishes such as spanking.

(d) supply sufficient evidence to substantiate its claim that a fetishistic activity occurred.

6.9 The Review Board found that there was some validity in the applicant's arguments.

6.10 The Review Board concluded that as the film contained real depictions of actual sexual activity between consenting adults in a way that is likely to cause offence to a reasonable adult, the film was appropriately classified X 18+. Its decision to apply the consumer advice lines of "contains real depictions of actual sexual activity" is made having regard to the content as set out in 5.1 and 5.2 above.

 

7. Summary

7.1 The Review Board's decision is to classify the film Fame is a Whore ... On Butt Row X18+ with the consumer advice "contains real depictions of actual sexual activity".

This decision is taken after full consideration of the applicant's submission, and after assessing the film as a whole against the relevant legislative criteria, including those contained in the Code, and in the current Classification Guidelines for Films and Videotapes determined under Section 12 of the Act.

Barbara Biggins
Convenor

 

Fame is a Whore on Butt Row (1996) - Directed by Joey Silvera


 

 

 

 

Fantasies of Men in Uniforms

Directed by Mike Ryan / 2000 / USA / IAFD

Date: May 2000
Rating:
RC
Time:
87m
Format:
VHS
Applicant:
The AXIS Group

 

Date: October 2000
Rating:
X18+ (Contains sexually explicit material)
Time:
75m
Format:
VHS
Applicant:
Adultshop.com
Comment:
Censored by 12m

 

Fantasies of Men in Uniforms (2000) - Directed by Mike Ryan


 

 

 

 

Feeding Frenzy 11

Directed by Jules Jordan / 2013 / USA / IMDb

Date: October 2013
Rating:
RC
Time:
161m
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
Calvista
Reason: Film 1(a) The film is classified RC in accordance with the National Classification Code, Films Table, 1. (a) as films that "depict, express or otherwise deal with matters of sex, drug misuse or addiction, crime, cruelty, violence or revolting or abhorrent phenomena in such a way that they offend against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that they should not be classified."


 

 

 

 

La Femme Experte

Directed by Mike Foster / 2000 / France / IMDb

Date: May 2002
Rating:
RC
Time:
99m
Format:
VHS
Applicant:
Adultshop.com

 

Date: August 2002
Rating:
X18+ (Contains sexually explicit material)
Time:
97m
Format:
VHS
Applicant:
Adultshop.com
Comment:
Censored by 2m

 

La Femme Experte (2000) - Directed by Mike Foster


 

 

 

 

Fetish Therapy

Directed by Gabriella Ponti / 1997 / Germany / IAFD

Date: June 2000
Rating:
RC
Time:
82m
Format:
VHS
Applicant:
The AXIS Group

 

Date: July 2000
Rating:
X18+ (Contains sexually explicit material)
Time:
81m
Format:
VHS
Applicant:
The AXIS Group
Comment:
Censored by 1m

 

Fetish Therapy (199?) - Directed by Gabriela Ponti


 

 

 

 

Fetish World

Produced by Bizarre Video / 2002 / USA / IAFD

In December 2003, FETISH WORLD was confiscated by Customs along with a DVD titled DOLL HOUSE (2003).

They described the film as:

“Fetish World” describing, depicting, expressing or otherwise dealing with matters of sex, cruelty, violence, or revolting or abhorrent phenomena in such a way that it offends against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that it should not be imported contrary to paragraph 233(1)(b) of the Customs Act 1901

The importer was charged, a court case, an appeal and cross appeal soon followed.

 

Vokalek v Commonwealth of Australia [2008] SASC 256 (19 September 2008)
austlii.edu.au

Fetish World

As earlier observed, the Magistrate dismissed the first Count with respect to the publication “Fetish World”. The Magistrate described the relevant images depicted as follows:

“Fetish World” includes scenes depicting various sexual behaviours including a scene in which two women pretending to be cats engage in behaviour with sexual overtones involving the licking of milk from each other’s bodies; an elaborate bondage scene where a woman is first bound and then flogged with what appears to be a type of whip. She then has painted on her a Chinese character which it is agreed translates as “Take me”. Other scenes depict sexual behaviour between a man and a woman in water both dressed in tight leather garments which cover their faces and bodies. These are then partially removed with scissors. Behaviour involved includes hard slapping of various parts of the body. There are further scenes in which a woman, who is bridled and treated as if she were a horse, is subjected to whipping by a person described as her “trainer”. There is clear evidence of redness to the skin on her buttocks. She also appears to flinch when struck in the chest area with a form of whip. I am satisfied that both these scenes involve violence albeit ritualised. “Fetish World” also contains a scene where women dressed and acting as schoolgirls are gradually undressed, masturbate themselves and each other, at times being watched by a fully dressed man masturbating himself. There is also a scene in which women made up and remaining still to appear like dolls, are the subject of sexual activity.

My review of this DVD confirms that the Magistrate’s description of the images depicted is accurate.

As earlier discussed, both parties agreed that the Magistrate applied the wrong test in reaching her conclusion that it had not been proved beyond reasonable doubt that the majority of reasonable adults would take the view that such a DVD would not be tolerated. In reaching that view, the Magistrate had specific regard to the evidence that the intended audience was private adult viewing. In that respect her Honour observed:

I am urged to consider placing the DVDs in question in the context of their intended audience namely the viewing by an adult in private. In this context, I take into account the comments in the various cases referred to above. For the reasons already set out, I accept that the size of the prospective audience or the degree to which the material might be generally available is a relevant consideration. I also note the comments by Bray CJ in Romeyko v Samuels (1972) 3 SASR 529 at 560 where he states, “something might be offensive to contemporary standards of decency in one context but not in another”. In addition, in Dalton v Bartlett 3 SASR 549 at 555, his Honour Chief Justice Bray states, on the topic of whether or not something is indecent, that it is “a question of fact to be decided by the application of an evalutatory standard after due consideration of the circumstances and the context.”

There is intended to be no dissemination here (c.f. Chance at 428-30). As set above, whether the materials are in the public or private domain is an important consideration (ibid at 431). A reasonable adult will place the material in the context of who sees it and may consider that it is legitimate for adults to experiment with sexuality in lawful and consensual ways in the context that the material is not intended to be in the public arena or shown to children. It is said that the videos are confronting, unlikely to be the sort of material sought out by the majority of adults in the community, but not requiring intervention and censorship.

In reaching her decision in regard to the DVD “Fetish World”, the Magistrate concluded:

As the cases reflect, it is not easy task to ascertain what are the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults. I am of the view that current community standards are broader and more tolerant now than in the past. Having considered the contents of the two DVDs and taking into account the need to balance the extent of tolerance likely to be generally felt by reasonable adults for consensual sexual behaviour which is to be limited in its availability as against what might breach their standards, I am of the view that I cannot be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt in relation to “Fetish World” that such material should be classified as offending against general community standards and therefore prohibited. I conclude that there is a reasonable possibility that the majority of reasonable adults may take the view that consenting behaviour of adults in these circumstances, albeit not the practice of most adults and indeed not considered by the majority to be desirable, can be tolerated when the DVD in question is for private viewing only. I reach this conclusion with some hesitation in relation to the “child” scene but I note that the two women actors who take the roles are clearly adults.
[Emphasis added]

In my view, the Magistrate was in error in proceeding on the basis that the DVD was “for private viewing only”. As earlier discussed, the test to be applied is whether the DVD “Fetish World” “depicts ... or otherwise deals with matters of sex ... cruelty, violence ... in such a way that [it] offends against standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that they should not be imported”. Once imported, the DVD would be available in Australia for unrestricted use without classification, and available for dissemination. “Fetish World” is not fit for unrestricted importation into Australia. Were the same DVD or a similar DVD to be produced in Australia and classified, members of the public would be aware of the limitations on the use of such material.

I consider that the DVD “Fetish World” does offend against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults to such an extent that it should not be imported. Scenes involving sex, cruelty and violence are depicted. Those scenes also include depictions of restraint through bondage and humiliation. The defendant should be convicted on the first Count.

As earlier observed, it was open to the defendant to have sought the permission of the Commonwealth Attorney-General to the importation. Had that course been followed, then the Attorney-General could have given consideration to the allowing of the importation, subject to conditions. That process may have led to the legal availability of the DVD for private adult viewing only. The defendant chose not to follow that course. Notwithstanding his evidence as to his intended use of the DVD, the DVD was imported into Australia. But for its seizure it would have been unclassified. There was nothing to stop the defendant from changing his mind, forming a different intention, and disseminating the DVD to others.

 

See the DOLL HOUSE (2003) entry for more information about this case.


 

 

 

 

Fighters

Directed by Robby D / 2011 / USA / IMDb

Date: December 2011
Rating:
RC
Time:
218m
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
Calvista
Reason: Film 1(a) The film is classified RC in accordance with the National Classification Code, Films Table, 1. (a) as films that "depict, express or otherwise deal with matters of sex, drug misuse or addiction, crime, cruelty, violence or revolting or abhorrent phenomena in such a way that they offend against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that they should not be classified."

 

Date: December 2011
Rating:
X18+ (Explicit sex)
Time:
125m
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
Calvista
Comment: This was for Disc 1 only. Total time is 218m when added to Disc 1 and 3.

 

Date: December 2011
Rating:
R18+ (High impact sexual activity and nudity)
Time:
93m
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
Calvista
Comment: This was for Disc No. 1 and No. 3 only. Total time is 218m when added to Disc 2.

 

Fighters (2011) - Directed by Robby D


 

 

 

 

 

The Final Link

Directed by Chi Chi La Rue / 2000 / USA / IMDb

Date: August 2009
Rating:
RC
Time:
132m
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
Calvista
Reason: Film 1(a) The film is classified RC in accordance with the National Classification Code, Films Table, 1. (a) as films that "depict, express or otherwise deal with matters of sex, drug misuse or addiction, crime, cruelty, violence or revolting or abhorrent phenomena in such a way that they offend against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that they should not be classified."

 

Date: August 2009
Rating:
X18+ (Explicit sex)
Time:
128m
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
Calvista
Comment:
Censored by 4m

 

The Final link (2000) - Directed by Chi Chi La Rue


 

 

 

 

Flesh Fest 3

Directed by Francesca Lé  / 2005 / USA / IMDb

Date: May 2005
Rating:
RC
Time:
Unknown
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
Calvista

 

Date: May 2005
Rating:
X18+ (Contains sexually explicit material)
Time:
Unknown
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
Calvista
Comment:
Censored by unknown time

 

Flesh Fest 3 (2005) - Directed by Francesca Lé


 

 

 

 

Free and Wild 10: High Energy

Directed by Charles McFarland / 2009 / Australia

Date: June 2009
Rating:
RC
Time:
76m
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
Syntech Video Co
Reason: Film 1(a) The film is classified RC in accordance with the National Classification Code, Films Table, 1. (a) as films that "depict, express or otherwise deal with matters of sex, drug misuse or addiction, crime, cruelty, violence or revolting or abhorrent phenomena in such a way that they offend against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that they should not be classified."
Comment: Warning on synetechvideo.com website 'Because of censorship board regulations, these videos are not for sale in Australia or New Zealand'

 

Free and Wild 10: High Energy (2009) - Directed by Charles McFarland


 

 

 

 

French Amateur Erotica 4

Directed by Rob Hout / 2010 / Australia

Date: May 2010
Rating:
RC
Time:
169m
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
FZ (NSW) Pty Ltd
Reason: Film 1(a) The film is classified RC in accordance with the National Classification Code, Films Table, 1. (a) as films that "depict, express or otherwise deal with matters of sex, drug misuse or addiction, crime, cruelty, violence or revolting or abhorrent phenomena in such a way that they offend against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that they should not be classified."

 

Date: June 2010
Rating:
RC
Time:
168m
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
FZ (NSW) Pty Ltd
Reason: Film 1(a) The film is classified RC in accordance with the National Classification Code, Films Table, 1. (a) as films that "depict, express or otherwise deal with matters of sex, drug misuse or addiction, crime, cruelty, violence or revolting or abhorrent phenomena in such a way that they offend against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that they should not be classified."

 

Date: October 2010
Rating:
X18+ (Explicit sex)
Time:
163m
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
Xpress Media Pty Ltd
Comment:
Censored by 6m


 

 

 

 

French Archives Volume 3

Directed by Unknown / 2015 / Unknown

Date: November 2015
Rating:
RC
Time:
287m
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
Syntech Video Co
Comment:
Volume 1 and 2  of these naturist DVDs were rated M (Nudity throughout)
Warning on synetechvideo.com website 'Unfortunately, this DVD has been banned from sale in Australia by the Australian government censorship board'
Reason:
Film 1(b) The film is classified RC in accordance with the National Classification Code, Films Table, 1. (b) as films that "depict in a way that is likely to cause offence to a reasonable adult, a person who is, or appears to be, a child under 18 (whether the person is engaged in sexual activity or not)."

 

French Archives Volume 3 (2015) - Synetech Video Co


 

 

 

 

Fresh Hot Babes 6

Directed by Peter Wolf / 1997 / USA / IMDb

Date: September 2000
Rating:
RC
Time:
83m
Format:
VHS
Applicant:
The AXIS Group
Comment: An appeal was immediately lodged with the Review Board. This was withdrawn after it became clear that it would be reviewed under the stricter X18+ guidelines. These had been introduced in September 2000.

 

Date: November 2000
Rating:
RC
Time:
82m
Format:
VHS
Applicant:
Adultshop.com
Comment: Censored by 1m

 

Fresh Hot Babes 6 (1997) - Directed by Peter Wolf


 

 

 

 

Fresh Meat 4

Directed by John Leslie / 1997 / USA / IMDb

Date: October 2000
Rating:
RC
Time:
135m
Format:
VHS
Applicant:
The AXIS Group

 

Date: March 2001
Rating:
X18+ (Contains sexually explicit material)
Time:
135m
Format:
VHS
Applicant:
Adultshop.com
Comment: Both 135m

 

Fresh Meat 4 (1997) - Directed by John Leslie


 

 

 

 

Fresh off the Boat

aka Clubgallery.com's Fresh off the Boat

Directed by Ed Hunter / 2008 / USA / IMDb

Date: July 2010
Rating:
RC
Time:
117m
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
Homesafe DVD
Reason: Film 1(a)&(b) The film is classified RC in accordance with the National Classification Code, Films Table, 1. (a) as films that "depict, express or otherwise deal with matters of sex, drug misuse or addiction, crime, cruelty, violence or revolting or abhorrent phenomena in such a way that they offend against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that they should not be classified," and (b) "describe or depict in a way that is likely to cause offence to a reasonable adult, a person who is, or appears to be, a child under 18 (whether the person is engaged in sexual activity or not)."


 

 

 

 

Fuck Me

aka Katja Kassin's Fuck Me

Directed by Gazzman / 2005 / UK / IMDb

Date: October 2006
Rating:
RC
Time:
Unknown
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
Calvista
Reason: Film 1(a) The film is classified RC in accordance with the National Classification Code, Films Table, 1. (a) as films that "depict, express or otherwise deal with matters of sex, drug misuse or addiction, crime, cruelty, violence or revolting or abhorrent phenomena in such a way that they offend against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that they should not be classified."

 

Date: November 2006
Rating:
X18+ (Explicit sex)
Time:
Unknown
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
Calvista
Comment:
Censored by unknown time

 

Fuck Me (2005) - Directed by Gazzman


 

 

 

 

Furious Fuckers

Directed by Rocco Siffredi / 2007 / USA / IMDb

Date: July 2007
Rating:
RC
Time:
Unknown
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
Calvista
Reason: Film 1(a)&(b) The film is classified RC in accordance with the National Classification Code, Films Table, 1. (a) as films that "depict, express or otherwise deal with matters of sex, drug misuse or addiction, crime, cruelty, violence or revolting or abhorrent phenomena in such a way that they offend against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that they should not be classified," and (b) "describe or depict in a way that is likely to cause offence to a reasonable adult, a person who is, or appears to be, a child under 18 (whether the person is engaged in sexual activity or not)."

 

Date: July 2007
Rating:
X18+ (Explicit sex)
Time:
Unknown
Format:
DVD
Applicant:
Calvista
Comment:
Censored by unknown time

 

Furious Fuckers (2007) - Directed by Rocco Siffredi


 

 

Next Adult Films: G  or  A to Z Listing